I used to spend a lot of time writing articles for lomography magazine; not a real magazine, but a fan section of a camera website where you could submit reviews of cameras and film and related stories, and if they published them you would get some store credit. At one time, I had 100 articles published on the site. I was a little obsessed. Here’s one:
The Argus C3, a range finder camera affectionately known by its many lovers as “the Brick”, is an artifact right out of the early mid-19th century machine age. The front of the camera is covered in gears, and it could easily pass for a highly specialized scientific measuring device at first glance. It is constructed of heavy Bakelite and metal, so you can guess that it’s about as heavy as a brick…hence the nickname.
When I found this beauty, I had been looking for a fully manual camera to force myself to learn a little bit more about photography. Well, this camera is as fully manual as it gets. The rangefinder focuses from 3 ft. to infinity, the aperture can be adjusted continuously from f3.5 to f16. The shutter, which is cocked manually, can be set anywhere from 1/300 to 1/10 with a Bulb mode as well. The frame counter is a unique system with a numbered dial that turns in a complete revolution for every frame. The lens comes off, so could be replaced with a different option.
When I saw this camera in a camera repair shop, I was so attracted by it’s rugged good looks that I had to get to the internet as soon as I could, to learn whatever I could find out about it.
Here’s what I learned:
-It was mass produced from 1939 – 1966 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
-So many were made that they remain fairly inexpensive even 40 – 70 years later.
-It was cheap and durable, so it outlasted much of its competition, and the same design, only slightly modified was popular for three decades
-many people credit this camera with making 35mm popular in North AmericaOne note for those of you who want to try one out: once you’ve cocked the shutter, get your fingers out of the way. Many times I have snapped only to find that I’ve obstructed the shutter cock, and exposed the film for longer than I wanted.
Even though this is not a Russian camera, or a lovely Lomography legend, I certainly feel like a lomographer when I’m carrying it in it’s original leather case around my neck. When I am snapping with this gem, bystanders know that something interesting is happening.
Oh yeah, and when I dropped it on my living room floor, it took a chunk out of the
hardwood and the next shot turned out just fine.Originally published Nov 25, 2008.














Wow, Jeff! 1) Do you still have your brick? 2) What year was it from? https://argusinfo.net/DatingGuide/DatingYourArgus.htm 3)Publishing online in 2008? Wow x2!! Better yet, you made it pay. Kudos. Back then in the infancy of digital camera phones and pretty low res digital cameras, did you ever butt heads with burgeoning digital fan-boys?
When I was overseas I used to love sitting and listening to the Brits talking "kit" of all sorts. They'd wind each other up and explode about the smallest details, ranting and railing at each other over beers on hot Sundays when we were all off work and visiting what passed for the local watering hole. Good times, good times.
Great post! Keep 'em coming...
I love your camera reviews. Some pithy comebacks/words of advice buried within: don’t let your fingers block the shutter cock. Reminds me of “don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out.” 😂